|
Dental Hygiene Education and Hiring Practices of Dentists in Ohio
|
James A. Lalumandier, DDS, MPH1
Catherine A. Demko, PhD2
Kate J. Burke, BS3
-
Chair and Associate Professor of Community Dentistry, Case Western
Reserve University School of Dental Medicine
-
Assistant Professor in Community Dentistry, Case Western Reserve
University School of
Dental
Medicine, Co-Director of Community
Research for Oral Wellness Network
-
Pre-Dental Student
United States
Citation:
Lalumandier, J., Demko, C., Burke, K. Dental Hygiene Education and
Hiring Practices of Dentists in Ohio. The Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and
Practice. April 2008, Volume 6 Number 2.
|
Abstract
Purpose: As education and clinical
preparation affect employment opportunities for entry-level dental
hygienists, dentists’ perceptions of recent graduates should be
considered when reforming education requirements. The purpose of
this study is to examine general dentists’ preferences for employing
entry-level dental hygienists from two-year versus four-year degree
programs by surveying the opinions of dentists in Ohio.
Method: A survey was distributed from June to September
2004, to a sample of 700 general dentists practicing in Ohio,
all alumni of Case Western Reserve University School of Dental
Medicine. The survey included questions on hiring preference,
salary, value of work experience, and applicable science and
dentistry knowledge. Results: Fifty-six percent of
responding dentists (n=225) have no preference for hiring a recent
four-year dental hygiene graduate over a recent two-year graduate.
Furthermore, the majority of responding dentists are not willing to
pay a higher salary to recent graduates of four-year degree
programs, including those with a hygienist holding a baccalaureate
degree. Responding dentists perceive greater science knowledge
among recent four-year graduates, but equal knowledge of performing
prophylaxis and patient care among graduates of both programs. Conclusion: Two-thirds of responding dentists
believe differences between recent two-year and four-year dental
hygiene graduates no longer exist after two years of work
experience. Perceptions of the significant role of work experience
in training suggest that future reforms in dental hygiene education
should incorporate more clinical experience to advance the
professional capabilities of entry-level hygienists. |
|
Keywords
and terms: dental hygiene education, dental hygiene
degree, dentist perceptions, dental hygienist employment |
|